El amoniaco en las explotaciones avícolas: efectos sobre las aves y el ambiente
The ammonia in poultry operations: effects on birds and environment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54167/tch.v11i2.160Palabras clave:
amoniaco, contaminación ambiental, pollosResumen
La mitigación de gases que contaminan el ambiente es uno de retos de la sociedad actual. Algunas actividades económicas son fuente de emisión de gases contaminantes, como es la avicultura, que presenta la mayor concentración y emisión de NH3 comparada con otras explotaciones de animales. Este gas repercute en el desarrollo y bienestar de las aves; en altas concentraciones, influye en la proliferación de enfermedades oculares, respiratorias e incluso, contribuye al daño de la almohadilla plantar en pollos. En general, el amoniaco tiene repercusiones contaminantes en aire, suelo y agua; genera malos olores, altera pH y reciclaje de nutrientes del suelo; provoca eutrofización y contaminación de cuerpos de agua, y en situaciones graves, afecta la salud humana. Es importante cuantificar la emisión de amoniaco en granjas avícolas, mediante investigaciones que contribuyan a proponer estrategias que reduzcan las emisiones de este gas y los efectos sobre los ecosistemas naturales.
Descargas
Citas
Allain, V., L. Mirabito, C. Arnould, M. Colas, S. Le Bouquin, C. Lupo & V. Michel. 2009. Skin lesions in broiler chickens measured at the slaughterhouse: Relationships between lesions and between their prevalence and rearing factors. British Poultry Science. 50:407–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660903110901
Arellano, P. G. 2014. Conservación y calidad de la yacija en naves de pollos. Informe Veterinario albéitar. Portal veterinario. https://tinyurl.com/45zpfmk3
Bao, Y. M., M. Choct, P. A. Iji & K. Bruerton. 2007. Effect of organically complexed copper, iron, manganese, and zinc on broiler performance, mineral excretion, and accumulation in tissues. Journal Applied Poultry Research. 16(3): 448–455. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/16.3.448
Beker, A., S. L. Vanhooser, J. H. Swartzlander & R. G. Teeter. 2004. Atmospheric ammonia concentration effects on broiler growth and performance. Journal Applied Poultry Research. 13(1): 5- 9. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/13.1.5
Bilgili, S. F., J. B. Hess, J. P. Blake, K. S. Macklin, B. Saenmahayak & J. L. Sibley. 2009. Influence of bedding material on footpad dermatitis in broiler chickens. Journal Applied Poultry Research. 18(3): 583–589. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2009-00023
Bjerg, B., P. Liberati, A. Marucci, G. Zhang, T. Banhazi, T. Bartzanas, G. Cascone, I.B. Lee & T. Norton. 2013. Modelling of ammonia emissions from naturally ventilated livestock buildings. Part 1. Ammonia reléase modelling. Biosystems Enginering. 116 (3): 232-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2013.01.010
Bokkers, E. A. M., I. J. M. Boer & P. Koene. 2011. Space need of broilers. Animal welfare. 20(4): 623-632. https://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/wurpubs/411675
Bruce, D. W., S. G. Mcilroy & E. A. Goodall. 1990. Epidemiology of a contact dermatitis of broilers. Avian Pathology 19(3):523–537. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079459008418705
Çabuk, M., A. Alçiçek, M. Bozkurt & S. Akkan. 2004. Effect of Yucca schidigera and natural zeolite on broiler performance. International Journal Poultry Science 3(10): 651–654. https://dx.doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2004.651.654
Constable, M., M. Charlton, F. Jensen, R. G. Craig & W. K. Taylor. 2003. An ecological risk assessment of ammonia in the aquatic environment. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal 9(2): 527-548. https://doi.org/10.1080/713609921
Dawkings, M. S., C. A. Donelly & T. A. Jones. 2004. Chicken welfare is influenced more by housing conditions than by stocking density. Nature 427: 342-344. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02226
Donald J. 1997. Tendencias en el control ambiental en galpones avícolas. Revista Industria Avícola 44(6): 10-17.
Ekstrand, C., B. Algers & J. Svedberg. 1997. Rearing conditions and foot-pad dermatitis in Swedish broiler chickens. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 31(3-4):167–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5877(96)01145-2
Ferguson, N. S., R. S. Gates, J. L. Taraba, A. H. Cantor, A. J. Pescatore, M. L. Straw, M. J. Ford & D. J. Burnham. 1998. The effect of dietary protein and phosphorus on ammonia concentration and litter composition in broilers. Poultry Science 77(8):1085-1093. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/77.8.1085
Garcês, A., S. M. S. Afonso, A. Chilundoç & C. T. S. Jairoce. 2013. Evaluation of different litter materials for broiler production in a hot and humid environment: 1. Litter characteristics and quality. Journal Applied Poultry Research 22(2): 168–176. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2012-00547
Greene, J. A., R. M. Mccracken & R. T. Evans. 1984. A contact dermatitis of broilers-clinical and pathological findings. Avian Pathology 14: 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079458508436205
Grimes, J. L., J. Smith & C. M. Williams. 2002. Some alternative litter materials used for growing broilers and turkeys. World’s Poultry Science Journal 58(4): 515–526. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS20020037
Groot P. W.G. 1994. Review on emissions of ammonia from housing systems for laying hens in relation to sources, processes, building design and manure handling. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 59(2): 73-87. https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1994.1065
Hester, P. Y., D. L. Cassens & T. A. Bryan. 1997. The applicability of particleboard residue as a litter material for male turkeys. Poultry Science 76(2): 248–255. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/76.2.248
Jodas, S., & H. M. Hafez. 2001. Manejo de la cama y enfermedades relacionadas de los pavos. Revista Avicultura Profesional 19(5): 17-21.
Kaur, D., A. P. S. Sethi, A. Sharma & M. Chandra. 2015. Evaluation of Yucca schidigera extract as feed additive on performance of broiler chicks in winter season. Veterinary World 8(4): 556–559. https://doi.org/10.14202%2Fvetworld.2015.556-560
Lazarevic, M., R. Resanovic, I. Vucicevic, A. Kpcher & C. A. Moran. 2014. Effect of feeding a comercial ammonia binding product De-Odorase on broiler chicken performance. Journal of Applied Animal Nutrition 2(8): 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1017/jan.2014.1
Martland, M. F. 1985. Ulcerative dermatitis in broiler chickens: The effects of wet litter. Avian Pathology 14(3): 353–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079458508436237
Meluzzi, A., C. Fabbri, E. Folegatti & F. Sirri. 2008. Survey of chicken rearing conditions in Italy: Effects of litter quality and stocking density on productivity, foot dermatitis and carcase injuries. British Poultry Science 49(3): 257-264. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660802094156
Miles, D. M., D. E. Rowe & T. C. Cathcart. 2011. High litter moisture content suppresses litter ammonia volatilization. Poultry Science 90(7): 1397-1405. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-01114
Miles, D. M., W. W. Miller, S. L. Branton, W. R. Maslin & B. D. Lott. 2006. Ocular responses to Ammonia in Broiler Chickens. Avian Diseases 50(1): 45-49. https://doi.org/10.1637/7386-052405r.1
Miles, D. M., S. L. Branton & B. D. Lott. 2004. Atmospheric Ammonia is detrimental to the performance of modern commercial Broilers. Poultry Science 83(10):1650-1654. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.10.1650
Nollet, L., J. D. Van der Flis, M. Lensing & P. Spring. 2007. The effect of replacing inorganic with organic trace minerals in broiler diets on productive performance and mineral excretion. Journal Applied Poultry Research 16(4): 592–597. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2006-00115
Pacheco, A. J., M. R. Sauri & A. S. Cabrera. 1997. Impacto de la Porcicultura en el Medio Ambiente. Revista Académica de la Facultad de Ingeniería de Yucatán 1(3):53-58. https://www.revista.ingenieria.uady.mx/volumen13/estimacion_potencial.pdf
Patterson, P. & H. Adrizal. 2005. Management strategies to reduce air emissions: Emphasis-dust and ammonia. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 14(3): 638- 650. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/14.3.638
Quintana, J. 1999. Avitecnia: Manejo de las aves domésticas más comunes. 3ª ed. Ed Trillas. ISBN 6071708117, 9786071708113.
Ritz, C. V., B. Fairchild & M. Lacy. 2004. Implications of Ammonia Production and Emissions from Commercial Poultry Facilities: A Review. Journal Applied Poultry Research 13(4): 684-692. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/13.4.684
Roney, N., F. Llanos, S. Little & D. B. Knaebel. 2004. Toxicological Profile of Ammonia. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp126.pdf
Rostagno, H.S., L. F. T. Albino & J. L. Donzele. 2011. Tabelas Brasileiras para Aves e Suínos: Composição de Alimentos e Exigências Nutricionais. 3ª ed. UFV/DZO. https://centrodepesquisasavicolas.files.wordpress.com/2011/02/tabelas-brasileiras-2011.pdf
Sainsbury, D. 2000. Poultry health and management-chickens, turkeys, ducks, geese, and quail. 4th ed. Blackwell Scientific. ISBN 0632051728, 9780632051724.
SAGARPA. 2009. Situación actual y perspectiva de la producción de carne de pollo en México. SAGARPA.
Shao D., J. He, J. Lu, Q. Wang, L. Chang, S. R. Shi & H. T. Bing. 2015. Effects of sawdust thickness on the growth performance, environmental condition and welfare quality of yellow broilers. Journal Poultry Science 94(1): 1-6. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/peu003
Shyam, G., Ch. Vijay, A. K. Panda, M. V. L. N. Raju & S. V. Rama. 2013. Effect of supplemental organic Zn and Mn on broiler performance, bone measures, tissue mineral uptake and immune response at 35 days of age. Research in Poultry Science 3 (1): 1-11. https://scialert.net/fulltext/?doi=crpsaj.2013.1.11
Sirri, F., G. Minelli, E. Folegatti, S. Lolli & A. Meluzzi. 2007. Foot dermatitis and productive traits in broiler chickens kept with different stocking densities, litter types and light regimen. Italian Journal Animal Science 6(1): 734–736. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2007.1s.734
Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, R. B. Alley, T. Berntsen, N. L. Bindoff, Z. Chen, A. Chidthaisong, J. M. Gregory, G. C. Hegerl, M. Heimann, B. Hewitson, B. J. Hoskins, F. Joos, J. Jouzel, V. Kattsov, U. Lohmann, T. Matsuno, M. Molina, N. Nicholls, J. Overpeck, G. Raga, V. Ramaswamy, J. Ren, M. Rusticucci, R. Somerville, T. F. Stocker, P. Whetton, R. A. Wood & D. Wratt. 2007. Technical Summary. In Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar4/wg1/
Sørensen, P., G. Su & S. C. Kestin. 2000. Effects of age and stocking density on leg weakness in broiler chickens. Poultry Science 79(6): 864–870. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.6.864
Summers, J. D. 1993. Reducing nitrogen excretion of the laying hen by feeding lower crude protein diets. Poultry Science 72(8): 1473–1478. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0721473
Taira, K., T. Nagai, T. Obi & K. Takase. 2014. Effect of litter moisture on the development of footpad dermatitis in broiler chickens. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science 76(4): 583–586. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.13-0321
Unión Nacional de Avicultores (UNA). http://una.org.mx
Van der Sluis, W. 2010. El complejo Zinc reduce las pododermatitis. Revista Selecciones Avícolas 52 (12): 18-20. https://seleccionesavicolas.com/avicultura/2010/12/el-complejo-de-zinc-reduce-las-dermatitis-plantares
Weaver, W. D. & R. Meijerhof. 1991. The effect of different levels of relative humidity and air movement on litter conditions, ammonia levels, growth and carcass quality for broiler chickens. Poultry Science 70(4): 746-755. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0700746
Wyatt, R. 1985. La ventilación en los galpones. Revista Avicultura Profesional 3(2): 75-76.
Publicado
Cómo citar
-
Resumen1380
-
PDF251
-
HTML30
