La estafa académica: fraude en las publicaciones científicas
The academic scam: fraud in scientific publications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54167/tecnociencia.v13i3.478Keywords:
scientific publication, academic fraud, scientific article, scientific discourse, science communicationAbstract
Fraud in publications of scientific origin is a practice that has gained strength from the development of electronic journals and open access to the Internet. The combination of these dishonest practices and the pressure to publish to which researchers are subjected under the premise of «publish or perish» may jeopardize their image and credibility. In this situation, both researchers and academics, editorial committees, journal evaluators and proofreaders can be involved. The objective of this article is to expose the characteristics of the main fraudulent practices in the process of publishing scientific articles. Some forms described are predatory and kidnapped journals, fraudulent practices in the process of evaluating articles subject to arbitration and false scientific productivity. It is considered important to note that the authors have a great responsibility regarding their own writings, so it is advisable to review the suitability and acceptable minimums of the journals where they intend to publish, and thereby avoid being tempted to disseminate their creations in the fraudulent media that could affect their prestige as a researcher.
Downloads
References
Abad-García, M. F. 2019. Plagiarism and predatory journals: A threat to scientific integrity. Anales de Pediatria 90(1):57.e1-57.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anpedi.2018.11.003
Bertoglia, M. P. & A. Aguila Abarca. 2016. The predatory menace: How do predatory journals discredit the Open Access Movement. Medwave 16(Suppl6): 6625–6625. http://dx.doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2016.6625
Bowman, J. D. 2014. Predatory publishing, questionable peer review, and fraudulent conferences. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 78(10):1–6. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7810176
Dadkhah, M. 2015. Paper Hijacking: Hijackers are Attacking Journals for Hijacking Unpublished Papers. Journal of Digital Information Management 13(4):306–307. https://bit.ly/3xxtpre
Dadkhah, M., G. Borchardt & T. Maliszewski. 2017. Fraud in Academic Publishing: Researchers Under Cyber-Attacks. American Journal of Medicine 130(1):27–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.08.030
Das, A. K. 2016. ‘Peer review’ for scientific manuscripts: Emerging issues, potential threats, and possible remedies. Medical Journal Armed Forces India 72(2):172–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mjafi.2016.02.014
Díaz, G. M. 2016. El fraude en las publicaciones científicas: más allá de fabricar, falsificar y plagiar. TecnoLógicas 19(36):9. https://doi.org/10.22430/22565337.583
Ferguson, C., A. Marcus & I. Oransky. 2014. Publishing: The peer-review scam. Nature 515(7528):480–482. https://doi.org/10.1038/515480a
Gerónimo, C. Q. 2004. ¿Es el Factor de Impacto un buen indicador para medir la calidad de las revistas científicas?: análisis de algunos problemas generados por su uso. Infobib 3:1050–1056. http://eprints.rclis.org/5002/
Jalalian, M. & H. Mahboobi. 2014. Hijacked Journals and Predatory Publishers: Is There a Need to Re-Think How to Assess the Quality of Academic Research? Walailak Journal of Science and Technology 11(5):389–394. https://doi.org/10.14456/wjst.2014.16
Parodi, G. 2010. Written discourse genres. In Academic and Professional Discourse Genres in Spanish (pp. 17–35). John Benjamins Publishing Company. ISBN 9027223149, 9789027223142.
Picazo, D., A. Cordero & C. P. Contreras. 2019. La retórica como esfuerzo deliberado para influir en el ánimo de la sociedad: estudio de casos en los ámbitos científico, político y redes sociales. En Discurso mediático y audiencias: una aproximación crítica a la comunicación de masas. Vol. I. Primera Edición. (p. 192). Egregius Ediciones. ISBN 9788418167041. https://hdl.handle.net/11441/91644
Restrepo, J. C. 2020. La revisión por pares (peer review) en las revistas científicas: un proceso que requiere intervención. Tempus Psicológico 3(1):133–155. https://doi.org/10.30554/tempuspsi.3.1.3410.2020
Richtig, G., M. Berger, B. Lange-Asschenfeldt, W. Aberer & E. Richtig. 2018. Problems and challenges of predatory journals. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 32(9):1441– 1449. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.15039
Sample, I. 2014. Now computer-generated fake papers are flooding academia. The Guardian. https://bit.ly/3NdtrtW
Spinak, E. 2014. In the beginning it was just plagiarism – now its computer-generated fake papers as well. https://bit.ly/3uhbVyD
Van Noorden, R. 2014. Publishers withdraw more than 120 gibberish papers. Nature 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2014.14763







