Produivity andne Engiering Production Function for Production of Glucosyltransferase by Fermentation

Productivity and Engineering Production Function for Production of Glucosyltransferase by Fermentation

Authors

  • Marco Antonio Paredes-Lizárraga Instituto Tecnológico de los Mochis

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54167/tecnociencia.v15i3.844

Keywords:

production function, stepwise restricted nonlinear regression, Excel® Solver®, production elasticity, productivity

Abstract

An engineering production function model is presented to model the production of glycosyltransferase by fermentation, with the objective of determining the maximum production, maximum productivity and unit elasticity. To the data of the first DOE published by Kawaguti et al. (2005), the restricted statistical regression method (with R2 = 0.981, P = 001) and restricted optimization were applied in the Excel® Solver® software. To ferment, cane molasses (X1 gL-1), corn liquor (X2 gL-1) and yeast (X3 gL-1) Erwinia Sp. were used. In quantities identified by the input vector X = (X1, X2, X3). For each selected optimal combination, the forecasts for glucosyltransferase production, cost per experiment and productivity are: optimal production at (129.39, 72.897, 16.77) with 5.78 UmL-1, $0.74 and 7.75 UmL-1$-1 respectively; for maximum productivity in (118.39, 42,14, 4) with 4.56, $0.31 and 14.48; for optimal productivity (unit elasticity and constant returns) at (102.44, 36.48, 3.46) with 4.01, $0.27 and 14.73 respectively. The returns to scale and elasticity lead us to explore the vector (102.56, 36.52, 3.47) as the center of the next sequential experimental design, such that this design achieves a better approximation to constant yields and global optimal productivity.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54167/tecnociencia.v15i3.844

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barlow, J., and Vodenska, I. (2020). Socio-Economic Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3720785

Chenery, H. B. (1949). Engineering Production Function. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 63, 507-531. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882136

Davis, M., & Davis, R. (2003). Fundamentals of Chemical Reaction Engineering. Mc. Graw Hill. https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechBOOK:2003.001

Dollery, B., Byrnes, J. y Crase, L. (2007). Economies of Scale and Population Size in Australian Local Government Structural Reform Programs. Working Papers Series. https://bit.ly/3MI2nDk

Fogler, S. (2016). Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering. Prentice Hall.

Gechert, S., Havranek, T., Irsova, Z., & Kolcunova, D. (2019). Douglas production Function? A Quantitative Survey of the Capital-Labor Substitution Elasticity. Leibniz Information Centre for Economics. https://bit.ly/3KGB2QL

Gilpin, R., & Rusik, D. (2001). Global Political Economy Understanding the International Economic Order. Princeton University Press.

Gülbiten, Ö; Taymaz, E. (2000) Are Small Firms Inefficient? a Schumpeterian Analysis of Productivity Differentials. 9th Annual Conference of Economic Research Forum (ERF). https://bit.ly/3F9XrES

Ho, S. J., & Dimitrije R. (2017). Returns to Scale, Productivity Measurement, and Trends in U.S. Manufacturing Misallocation. Workink Papers. https://bit.ly/3iRBxvv

Humphrey, T. M. (1997). Algebraic Production Functions and Their Uses Before Cobb-Douglas. Economic Quarterly Volume 83/1. https://bit.ly/3LHErjs

Kawaguti, H. Y., Manrich, E., Fleuri, L., & Sato, H. (2005). Production of Glucosyltransferase by Erwinia Sp. Using Experimental. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 227-234. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822005000300005

Lee, Y., Kim, T. (2017). The Effects of Agricultural Extension Service on Farm Productivity: Evidence from Mbale District in Uganda. Preprints.org; 2017.http://dx.doi.org/10.20944/preprints201704.0162.v1.

Levenspiel, O. (1999). Elements of Chemical Reactions Engineering. Prentice Hall.

Marsden, J., Pingry, D., & Whinston, A. (1974). Engineering Foundations of Production Functions. Journal of Economic Theory, 124-140. https://bit.ly/3w0wqj0

ONU. (1978). Industry and Development No. 2. New York.

Paredes-Lizárraga, M. A. (2020). Modelación de la fermentación para la producción de fenilalanina. TECNOCIENCIA Chihuahua, 14(2), 48-65. https://doi.org/10.54167/tecnociencia.v14i2.511

Shehu, J.F. and Mshelia, S.I., (2007). Productivity and technical efficiency of small-scale rice farmers in Adamawa State, Nigeria. Journal of Agriculture & Social Sciences 3(4), 117-120. https://bit.ly/3LJcXtR

Thayaparan, A. & Neruja, N. (2021) Factors Influencing Technical Efficiency of Paddy Farms in Mullaitivu District: Non – Parametric Approach. Wayamba Journal of Management. Vol. 12. http://doi.org/10.4038/wjm.v12i1.7528

Wibe, S. (1983). Engineering Production Functions: A Survey. Economica, New Series, 51(204), pp. 401-411. https://bit.ly/3vFdDeb

Published

2021-12-16

How to Cite

Produivity andne Engiering Production Function for Production of Glucosyltransferase by Fermentation: Productivity and Engineering Production Function for Production of Glucosyltransferase by Fermentation. (2021). TECNOCIENCIA Chihuahua, 15(3), e 844. https://doi.org/10.54167/tecnociencia.v15i3.844

Most read articles by the same author(s)