Las estructuras de familia en Chihuahua en 2015: organización y dinámicas de cambio

Family structures in Chihuahua in 2015: Organization and dynamics of change

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54167/tch.v12i2.148

Keywords:

family structure, marriage, cohabitation, parenting, Mexico

Abstract

The Intercensal Survey conducted in 2015 by Mexico’s National Statistics and Geography Institute (Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía, INEGI) makes it possible to analyze in detail the family structures in Chihuahua, Mexico. To this end, this study takes a multidimensional approach to these structures that considers the dynamics of authority, the legal framework of rights and obligations, parentage, processes of stability and transition, and basic and complementary systems of social relationships. The application of this perspective resulted in the identification of four main family types in the state, based on whether they are headed by married couples, cohabiting couples, single women or single men, divided into 22 different subtypes. Altogether, these four family types account for 84.5 % of households in Chihuahua; another 12.4 % are single-person households, while another small group is made up of four different household types (3.1 % in total).  A comparative analysis is also offered of the results of the Population and Housing Censuses for 2000 and 2010.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54167/tch.v12i2.148

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acs, G. 2007. Can We Promote Child Well-Being by Promoting Marriage? Journal of Marriage and Family 69(5): 1326-1344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00450.x

Amador, D. & R. Bernal. 2012. ¿Unión libre o matrimonio? Efectos en el bienestar de los hijos. Fondo de Cultura Económica. El Trimestre Económico 79(315): 529-573. https://www.eltrimestreeconomico.com.mx/index.php/te/article/view/69

Arránz, O., V. Salzburger, N. Lois & B. Nauck. 2013. What narrows the stepgap? Closeness between parents and adult (step) children in Germany. Journal of Marriage and Family 75(5): 1130-1148. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12052

Ayllón, S. & N. N. Ferreira-Batista. 2015. ‘Mommy, I miss daddy’. The effect of family structure on children’s health in Brazil. Economics and Human Biology 19: 75-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2015.08.001

Castro, R. & I. Casique. 2008. Violencia de género en las parejas mexicanas. Análisis de resultados de la Encuesta Nacional sobre la Dinámica de las Relaciones en los Hogares 2006. Primera Edición. Instituto Nacional de las Mujeres. http://cedoc.inmujeres.gob.mx/documentos_download/100925.pdf

Dawkins, P., P. Gregg & R. Scutella. 2002. The growth of jobless households in Australia. The Australian Economic Review 35(2): 133-154. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8462.00231

Degraff, D. S. & D. Levison. 2009. Children’s work and mothers’ work––What is the connection? World Development 37(9): 1569-1587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.01.006

Duarte-Jáquez, C. H. 2012. 2º Informe de Gobierno. Resumen ejecutivo. Chihuahua: Secretaría de la Función Pública.

Duarte-Jáquez, C. H. 2013. 3º Informe de Gobierno. Resumen ejecutivo. Chihuahua: Secretaría de la Función Pública.

Duarte-Jáquez, C. H. 2014. 4º Informe de Gobierno. Resumen ejecutivo. Chihuahua: Secretaría de la Función Pública.

Duarte-Jáquez, C. H. 2015. 5º Informe de Gobierno. Resumen ejecutivo. Chihuahua: Secretaría de la Función Pública.

Dykstra, P. A. & R. Keizer. 2009. The wellbeing of childless men and fathers in Mid-life. Ageing & Society 29(8): 1227-1242. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X08008374

Feijten, P. & C. H. Mulder. 2010. Gender, divorce and housing - A life course perspective. Wohnen und gender. En Wohnen und Gender: theoretische, politische, soziale und räumliche Aspekte: gewidmet Ruth Becker (pp. 175-193). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. ISBN 9783531159102. https://hdl.handle.net/11245/1.311487

Hansen, T., T. Moum & A. Shapiro. 2007. Relational and individual well-being among cohabitors and married individuals in midlife. Recent trends from Norway. Journal of Family Issues 28(7): 910-933. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X07299610

Herrera, S., V. Salinas & E. Valenzuela. 2011. Familia, pobreza y bienestar en Chile: un análisis empírico de las relaciones entre estructura familiar y bienestar. Temas de la Agenda Pública 6(44): 1-19. https://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/1770

Howe, L. D., S. R. A. Huttly & T. Abramsky. 2006. Risk factors for injuries in young children in four developing countries: The Young Lives Study. Tropical Medicine and International Health 11(10): 1557-1566. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2006.01708.x

Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. 2010. Síntesis metodológica y conceptual del Censo de Población y Vivienda 2010. INEGI. https://www.inegi.org.mx/app/biblioteca/ficha.html?upc=702825002065

Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. 2015. Encuesta intercensal 2015: síntesis metodológica y conceptual. México: INEGI. https://www.inegi.org.mx/app/biblioteca/ficha.html?upc=702825078836

Kennedy, S. & C. A. Fitch. 2012. Measuring cohabitation and family structure in the United States: Assessing the impact of new data from the Current Population Survey. Demography 49(4): 1479-1498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-012-0126-8

Kulu, H. & E. Washbrook. 2014. Residential context, migration and fertility in a modern urban society. Advances in Life Course Research 21: 168-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2014.01.001

MacKenzie, M. B. & K. F. Fowler. 2013. Social anxiety disorder in the Canadian population: Exploring gender differences in sociodemographic profile. Journal of Anxiety Disorders 27(4): 427-434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2013.05.006

Marks, G. N. 2006. Family size, family type and student achievement: Cross-national differences and the role of socioeconomic and school factors. Journal of Comparative Family Studies 37(1): 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.37.1.1

Martin, N. & J. Vall. 2016. Effects of the great recession on drugs consumption in Spain. Economics and Human Biology 22: 103-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2016.03.005

Morissette, R. & Y. Ostrovsky. 2007. Income instability of lone parents, Singles and two-parent families in Canada, 1984 to 2004. Analytical Studies Branch Research Paper Series. Ottawa: Statistics Canada. Minister of Industry. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/11f0019m/11f0019m2007297-eng.htm

Poortman, A. R. and Voorpostel, M. 2009. Parental divorce and sibling relationships. A research note. Journal of Family Issues 30(1): 74-91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X08322782

Pliego-Carrasco, F. 2012. Familias y bienestar en sociedades democráticas. Miguel Ángel Porrúa. ISBN 6074015309, 9786074015300.

Pliego-Carrasco, F. 2014. Las familias en México. Editorial Porrúa. ISBN 6070917502, 9786070917509.

Pliego-Carrasco, F. 2017. Estructuras de familia y bienestar de niños y adultos. El debate cultural del siglo XXI. Cámara de Senadores. LXIII Legislatura. http://biblioteca.diputados.gob.mx/janium/bv/lxiii/estrfam_bieninadu.pdf

Sedlak, A. J., J. Mettenburg, M. Basena, I. Petta, K. McPherson, A. Green & S. Li. 2010. Fourth National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (NIS–4): Report to Congress. First Edition. Department of Health and Human Services. Administration for Children and Families. https://www.acf.hhs.gov/opre/report/fourth-national-incidence-study-child-abuse-and-neglect-nis-4-report-congress

Spiess, C. K. & K. Wrohlich. 2008. The parental leave benefit reform in Germany: Costs and labour market outcomes of moving towards the Nordic model. Population Research and Policy Review 27(5): 575-591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-008-9086-5

Published

2018-11-30

How to Cite

Las estructuras de familia en Chihuahua en 2015: organización y dinámicas de cambio: Family structures in Chihuahua in 2015: Organization and dynamics of change. (2018). TECNOCIENCIA Chihuahua, 12(2), 86-102. https://doi.org/10.54167/tch.v12i2.148