Stomatal characterization of wolfgrass [Muhlenbergia phleoides (Kunth) columbus] populations in the state of Chihuahua, Mexico
Stomatal characterization of wolfgrass [Muhlenbergia phleoides (Kunth) Columbus] populations in northern Mexico
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54167/tch.v18i1.1376Keywords:
stomatal characterization, Muhlenbergia phleoides, leaf anatomy, plant ecology, native speciesAbstract
Wolfgrass is native species of great importance in arid and semiarid áreas of northern Mexico. For this reason, the objetive was to explore and carry out a stomatal characterization in Wolfgrass populations. 33 populations in mature phenological stage were subject to study. The variables evaluates were number of stomata (NE), epidermal cells (NC), stomatal área (AE) and stomatal index (IE) on the adaxial (beam) and abaxial (underside) Surface of the leaf. The data were analyzed using a competely randomized block análisis of variance with five repetitions. The results show thet Wolftail is amphiestomatic species and has diacitic or caryophylaceous type stomata. Which suggests that stomatal characterization is an important technique that provides us with valuable information about the leaf structure of plant species.
Downloads
References
Abdulahi, M. M., Hashim, H., & Teha, M. (2016). Rangeland degradation: Extent, impacts, and alternative restoration techniques in the rangelands of Ethiopia. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems, 19(3): 305–318. https://www.revista.ccba.uady.mx/ojs/index.php/TSA/article/view/2234
Álvarez-Holguín, A., Morales-Nieto, C. R., Corrales-Lerma, R., Avendaño-Arrazate, C. H., Rubio-Arias, H. O., & VIllarreal-Guerrero, F. (2018). Caracterización estomática, concentración de clorofila y su relación con producción de biomasa en Bouteloua curtipendula. Agronomia Mesoamericana, 29(2): 251–261. https://doi.org/10.15517/ma.v29i2.29900
Bardgett, R. D., Bullock, J. M., Lavarel, S., Manning, P., Schaffner, U., Ostle, N., & Shi, H. (2021). Combatting global grassland degradation. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 2(10): 720–735. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00207-2
Bertolino, L. T., Caine, R. S., & Gray, J. E. (2019). Impact of stomatal density and morphology on water-use efficiency in a changing world. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10: 225. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPLS.2019.00225/FULL
Bucher, S. F., Auerswald, K., Grün-Wenzel, C., Higgins, S. I., Jorge, J. G., & Römermann, C. (2017). Stomatal traits relate to habitat preferences of herbaceous species in a temperate climate. Flora, 229: 107–115. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0367253017331328
Croxdale, J. L. (2000). Stomatal patterning in angiosperms. American Journal of Botany, 87(8): 1069-1080. https://doi.org/10.2307/2656643
Field, K. J., Duckett, J. G., Cameron, D. D., & Pressel, S. (2015). Stomatal density and aperture in non-vascular land plants are non-responsive to above-ambient atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Annals of Botany, 115(6): 915–922. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcv021
Haworth, M., Elliott-Kingston, C., & McElwain, J. C. (2013). Co-ordination of physiological and morphological responses of stomata to elevated [CO2] in vascular plants. Oecologia, 171(1): 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00442-012-2406-9
INEGI. (2013). Cartografía de uso de suelo y vegetación del estado de Chihuahua.
INEGI. (2015). Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. Anuario estadístico y geográfico de Chihuahua.
Klooster, B., & Palmer-Young, E. (2004). Water stress marginally increases stomatal density in E. canadensis, but not in A. gerardii. Tillers, 5: 35-40.
Lawson, T., & Blatt, M. R. (2014). Stomatal size, speed, and responsiveness impact on photosynthesis and water use efficiency. Plant Physiology, 164(4): 1556–1570. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.114.237107
Liu, C., He, N., Zhang, J., Li, Y., Wang, Q., Sack, L., & Yu, G. (2018). Variation of stomatal traits from cold temperate to tropical forests and association with water use efficiency. Functional Ecology, 32(1): 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12973
Márquez-Godoy, J. N., Corrales-Lerma, R., Álvarez-Holguín, A., Villarreal-Guerrero, F., Santellano-Estrada, E., Pinedo-Álvarez, A., & Morales-Nieto, C. R. (2022). Diversidad morfológica y nutricional de poblaciones de pasto lobero (Muhlenbergia phleoides Columbus) en Chihuahua, México. Acta Universitaria, 32: 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15174/au.2022.3404
Morales-Nieto, C. R., Avendaño-Arrazate, C., Melgoza-Castillo, A., Gil-Vega, K. D. C., Quero-Carrillo, A., Jurado-Guerra, P., & Martínez-Salvador, M. (2016). Caracterización morfológica y molecular de poblaciones de pasto banderita (Bouteloua curtipendula) en Chihuahua, México. Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Pecuarias, 7(4): 455–469. https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?pid=S2007-11242016000400455&script=sci_arttext
Morales-Nieto, C. R., Avendaño-Arrazate, C., Melgoza-Castillo, A., Martínez-Salvador, M., & Jurado-Guerra, P. (2015). Caracterización morfológica y molecular de poblaciones de zacate tempranero (Setaria macrostachya Kunth) en Chihuahua, México. Phyton, 84(1): 190–200. http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?pid=S1851-56572015000100026&script=sci_arttext
Parkhurst, D. F., Wong, S. C., Farquar, G. D., & Cowan. I. R. (1988). Gradients of intracelular CO2 levels across the leaf mesophyll. Plant Physiol. 86:1032-1037. doi:10.1104/pp.86.4.1032
Reyes-López, D., Quiroz-Valentín, J., Kelso-Bucio, H. A., Huerta-Lara, M., Avendaño-Arrazate, C. H., & Lobato-Ortiz, R. (2015). Caracterización estomática de cinco especies del género Vanilla. Agronomia Mesoamericana, 26(2): 237–246. https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v26i2.19279
Sánchez, M., & Aguirreola, J. (1996). Relaciones hídricas. Fisiologia y bioquímica vegetal. Edigrafos. Madrid. España. 49-90.
Statistical Analysis System (SAS). (2006). Statistical Analysis System 9.1.3: User´s guide. Cary. https://support.sas.com/documentation/onlinedoc/91pdf/stat_ug_7313.pdf
Trod, M. A., Tomas, P. A., Cervigni, G. D., Zabala, J. M., Marinoni, L. D., & Giavedoni, J. A. (2018). Análisis de la distribución y densidad estomática en Trichloris (Chloridoideae, Poaceae), bajo diferentes regímenes hídricos. Boletín de la Sociedad Argentina de Botánica, 53(4): 1-10.https://doi.org/10.31055/1851.2372.v53.n4.21979
Wang, Y., Chen, X., & Xiang, C. B. (2007). Sotomatal density and bio-water saving. Journal of integrative Plant Biology, 49(10): 1435-1444. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1672-9072.2007.00554.x
Wilkinson, R. H. (1979). The plant surface (mainly leaf). In Claredon Press. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1571980075013058688
Woodward, F. I., & Kelly, C. K. (1995). The influence of CO2 concentration on stomatal density. New Phytologist, 131(3): 311-327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1995.tb03067.x
Zermeño-González, A., Ríos-Estudillo, J. A., Gil-Marín, J. A., Cadena-Zapata, M., & Villarreal-Quintanilla, J. Á. (2011). Dinámica del flujo de bióxido de carbono y de energía sobre un pastizal natural del norte de México. Bioagro, 23(1): 35–42. http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1316-33612011000100005
Zhou, W., Yang, H., Zhou, L., Chen, Y., Huang, L., & Ju, W. (2018). Dynamics of grassland carbon sequestration and its coupling relation with hydrothermal factor of Inner Mongolia. Ecological Indicators, 95: 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.07.008
