Anaerobic capacity Physiological basis of anaerobic capacity: systematic review.

Authors

  • Joel Abraham Martinez Gonzalez UAEMex

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54167/rmccf.v1i1.901

Keywords:

performance test, physical exercise

Abstract

The maximal accumulated oxygen deficit (MAOD) is considered as the gold standard to estimate CAn. However, MAOD exhibits some methodological drawbacks which hinders its estimation and viability. Recently has been proposed an alternative method that considers the sum of the excess post exercise oxygen consumption (EPOCrápido) and the blood lactate concentrations ([LA-]), called EPOCrápido+[LA-].  This method promises to be valid, reliable, and much more viable than MAOD. Therefore, the main purpose of this systematic review was to collect information regarding the physiological and technical basis that enable the estimation of CAn through this new method.

This systematic review carried out the search in the following databases: PubMed, Redalyc y Revista CAPES, besides, it followed the PRISMA recommendations. Were considered articles regarding the physiological bases, the use of EPOCrápido+[LA-] as a method and relevant articles due to its application on field.

The physiological basis of EPOCrápido+[LA-] as a method to estimate CAn relies on the relationship between the phosphocreatine (PCr) recovery, the oxygen consumption (V̇O2) during EPOCrápido and the equivalent of [LA-] expressed as O2. Besides, is sensitive to detect different levels of training and changes in CAn using ergogenics. Thus, EPOCrápido+[LA-] can be used to estimate the bioenergetics of sports. However, special attention should be played into the mathematical procedures used in its estimation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2022-01-27

How to Cite

Martinez Gonzalez, J. A. (2022). Anaerobic capacity Physiological basis of anaerobic capacity: systematic review. Revista Mexicana De Ciencias De La Cultura Física, 1(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.54167/rmccf.v1i1.901
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    558
  • PDF (Español)
    320
  • HTML (Español)
    127

Issue

Section

Systematic Review or Meta-analysis

Metrics