Game theory applied to mechanisms of surveillance in Mexico

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54167/ejbei.v3i2.2339

Keywords:

Corruption, Public service, Signaling theory, Asset declaration, National Anti-Corruption System, Administrative sanctions

Abstract

Corruption is one of the main obstacles to the efficiency of public service, especially in Mexico, where it is manifested in the day‑to‑day conduct of public officials. This paper applies inspection theory, derived from game theory, to analyze the incentives and strategies that influence the truthfulness of declarations of assets and interests (DPI). Here we construct a game in which the public official decides between declaring truthfully (p) or falsifying (1 - p) their DPI. This choice derives from their actions or possible strategies, that is, whether the public official decides to file their DPI correctly or to falsify it. Once the official has submitted the declaration, the auditing body or institution observes it and decides whether to audit the declaration. Finally, the conditions under which a public official would choose to lie are examined, and it is concluded that it is necessary to strengthen the sanctioning regime to improve transparency and accountability mechanisms and, thereby, the effectiveness of the National Anti‑Corruption System in Mexico. The model is calibrated with statistical data taken from the National Census of the Federal Government (CNGF) that support the theoretical proposal.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aldana, A., Falcón-Cortés, A., & Larralde, H. (2022). A machine learning model to identify corruption in México's public procurement contracts. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.01478

Avenhaus, R., Canty, M., Kilgour, D. M., Von Stengel, B., & Zamir, S. (1996). Inspection games in arms control. European Journal of Operational Research, 90(3), 383-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00261-8

Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 169–217. https://doi.org/10.1086/259394

Beuve, J., & Saussier, S. (2025). Contracting with Public Authorities: Recent Developments. En C. Ménard, & M.M. Shirley (Eds.). Handbook of New Institutional Economics. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50810-3_26

Brown, D. S. (2011). Political polarization as a constraint on corruption: A cross-national comparison. World Development, 39(9), 1516-1529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.02.006

Carrillo-Viramontes, J. A., Saldaña-Hernández, M., Vázquez-Guzmán, D., & Ramos-Soto, A. L. (2024). Un Estudio Sobre la Corrupción Política en México: Consecuencias Económicas y Políticas. En V. H. Meriño Córdoba (Ed.), Gestión del Conocimiento: Perspectiva Multidisciplinaria (Libro 70) (págs. 51-67). Fondo Editorial de la Universidad Experimental Sur del Lago, Jesús María Semprum (UNE-SUR). https://doi.org/10.59899/Ges-cono-70-C3

Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094589

Collier, P. (2007). The Bottom Billion: Why the Poorest Countries are Failing and What Can Be Done About It. Oxford University Press.

Dabla-Norris., E. (2000). A game theoretic analysis of corruption in bureaucracies. IMF Working Papers, 2000(106). https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451852882.001

Estrada-Rodríguez, J. L. (2013). La corrupción administrativa en México. Polis, 9(2), 179-184. https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1870-23332013000200007

Falcón-Cortés, A., Aldana, A., & Larralde, H. (2022). Practices of public procurement and the risk of corrupt behavior before and after the government transition in México. EPJ Data Science, 11(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-022-00329-7

Flores-Márquez, H., & Jiménez-Gómez, A. (2024). Determinantes de la corrupción en México: aplicación con enfoque bayesiano. Ensayos Revista de Economía, 43(1), 51-82. https://doi.org/10.29105/ensayos43.1-3

Flores-Llanos, F. U. (2017). ¿Por qué persiste la corrupción en México? Gobiernos ineficientes o ciudadanos corruptos. [Tesis doctoral]. Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas. http://hdl.handle.net/11651/2258

Hao, X., & Qi, P. (2011). Analysis on corruption and collusive behaviors in government procurement in a game theory perspective. Journal of Management and Strategy, 2(2), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.5430/jms.v2n2p38

Kryvoi, Y., & Godhe, A. (2025). Enhancing anti-corruption via investment arbitration: from red flags to due diligence. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 16(1), idae020. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idae020

Lambert-Mogiliansky, A., Majumdar, M., & Radner, R. (2007). Strategic analysis of petty corruption: Entrepreneurs and bureaucrats. Journal of Development Economics, 83(2), 351–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2006.06.002

Lambert‐Mogiliansky, A., Majumdar, M., & Radner, R. (2008). Petty corruption: a game‐theoretic approach. International Journal of Economic Theory, 4(2), 273-297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-7363.2008.00078.x

Macrae, J. (1982). Underdevelopment and the economics of corruption: A game theory approach. World development, 10(8), 677-687. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(82)90093-6

Monsiváis-Carrillo, A. (2020). Corrupción y legitimidad democrática en México. Revista Mexicana de Sociología, 82(3). https://doi.org/10.22201/iis.01882503p.2020.3.58503

Nash, J. (1950). Equilibrium Points in N-Person Games. PNAS, 36(1), 48-49. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.36.1.4

Nicolás-Carlock, J. R., & Luna-Pla, I. (2024). Organized crime behavior of shell-company networks in procurement: Prevention insights for policy and reform. Trends in Organized Crime, 24, 412-428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12117-023-09499-w

Tiwari, D. (2025). Nexus: A unified approach to corruption choice and evidence. SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5242065

Todaro, M. P., & Smith, S. C. (2020). Economic Development (13a ed.). Pearson Education Limited.

Verma, P., & Sengupta, S. (2015). Bribe and punishment: An evolutionary game-theoretic analysis of bribery. PLoS One, 10(7), e0133441. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133441

Wang, X., Zhang, T., Gong, H., Li, J., Wu, B., Chen, B., & Zhao, S. (2024). Game-theoretic analysis of governance and corruption in China's pharmaceutical industry. Frontiers in Medicine, 11, 1439864. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1439864

Windsor, D. (2025). Tax Evasion, Bribery, and Money Laundering in Latin America and the Caribbean: Forms, Causes, Effects, and Remedies. En D. T. Mathews, & B. Christiansen (Eds.), Contemporary Examination of Latin America and the Caribbean: Economy, Education, and Technology (pp. 85-116). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3763-9

Published

07/01/2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Game theory applied to mechanisms of surveillance in Mexico. (2026). Economicus Journal of Business and Economics Insights, 3(2), 66-84. https://doi.org/10.54167/ejbei.v3i2.2339

Most read articles by the same author(s)